365) that we must not be lured into a one-sided preoccupation with the attempt to establish factual propositions about Jesus; but he uses that warning as a way of allowing demonstrably spurious historical reconstructions to remain unchallenged. As Moule insisted, taking history seriously does not constitute a vote for liberal Protestantism.8 Nor did the question of ‘what actually happened’ only begin to be felt important with John Locke.9 For much of the present investigation, the ‘question of god’
Page 6